President Donald Trump signed an Govt Order to abolish the U.S. Division of Schooling (DOE). Under is an summary of latest votes of involving the DOE forged by every US Senator and Consultant in Florida’s Congressional Delegation.
Senator Rick Scott (R-FL)
Sen. Rick Scott has been an outspoken proponent of eliminating the Division of Schooling. In late 2024, he advised the press, “It needs to be disbanded. We don’t want a federal Division of Schooling”
Senator Ashley Moody (R-FL)
Ashley Moody grew to become Florida’s junior U.S. Senator in early 2025 (after serving as state Legal professional Common), and he or she has typically echoed her celebration’s push to rein in federal businesses. Whereas she has not made any specific public name to abolish the Division of Schooling, she has persistently opposed what she sees as federal overreach in schooling. For instance, as Legal professional Common, she challenged Biden administration schooling insurance policies in courtroom, signaling help for shifting energy from Washington to states. (Moody’s federal legislative file continues to be new; no particular invoice or assertion from her but targets the Division’s existence.)
Rep. Neal Dunn (R-FL-2)
Neal Dunn has supported efforts to dismantle the Division of Schooling. Within the 118th Congress, he voted in favor of proposals to terminate the division, and within the present time period, he joined as a co-sponsor of Rep. Thomas Massie’s invoice (H.R. 899) to abolish the Division of Schooling
Although Dunn has not issued high-profile quotes on the subject, his legislative actions – backing payments to close down the company – clarify that he favors returning schooling authority to states and localities.
Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL-3)
Kat Cammack has been vocal in backing the push to remove the federal schooling division. She co-sponsored congressional laws to put off the Division and applauded President Trump’s early 2025 government order aimed toward that aim. In a March 2025 Fox Enterprise interview, Cammack mentioned the order to “remove the Division of Schooling”, questioning “why would we proceed to fund” an inefficient federal program
Her feedback and co-sponsorships underscore her view that schooling selections belong on the state/native degree slightly than with Washington.
Rep. Aaron Bean (R-FL-4)
Aaron Bean has taken concrete steps to shrink the Division of Schooling. In August 2023, as a freshman congressman and subcommittee chair, Bean launched a invoice to freeze hiring on the Division, calling it “simply step one to lower the position of the federal authorities and return schooling coverage to the place it belongs — the state and native degree”
He later joined as a co-sponsor of H.R. 899 to completely terminate the Division. Bean’s public statements body these strikes as a part of a broader effort to curb “bloated” federal involvement in faculties and empower dad and mom and states
Rep. John Rutherford (R-FL-5)
John Rutherford has not been particularly outspoken on schooling coverage within the press, however he did signal on to latest GOP laws to abolish the Division of Schooling. In 2025, Rutherford grew to become a co-sponsor of the Home invoice to remove the division, aligning himself with the Republican place that schooling needs to be dealt with by states slightly than by a “federal forms.” Whereas he hasn’t issued notable quotes on the topic, his help of that invoice indicators his stance in favor of dismantling the company.
Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL-7)
Cory Mills has ardently supported dismantling the Division of Schooling. In February 2024, he introduced he was the most recent Florida lawmaker to co-sponsor Rep. Massie’s H.R. 899, declaring it a “much-needed step to academic freedom and shrinking of federal authorities”
Mills publicly thanked Rep. Massie and stated, “Let’s get again to state & particular person rights as supposed underneath our tenth Modification, empowering parental rights, and cut back the dimensions and overreach of the federal authorities”
This assertion – shared when he joined the abolish-DOE invoice – makes clear Mills’ view that closing the Division will return rightful management of schooling to states, dad and mom, and native entities.
Rep. Mike Haridopolos (R-FL-8)
Mike Haridopolos, newly elected to Congress in 2024, has rapidly aligned along with his celebration’s efforts to dismantle the federal Schooling Division. Upon taking workplace in 2025, Haridopolos co-sponsored Rep. Massie’s invoice to terminate the Division of Schooling
Though, as a newcomer, he has not but made outstanding public statements on the problem, his early legislative motion signifies help for eliminating the company and shifting its capabilities to states or different our bodies. (Haridopolos beforehand served in Florida’s state legislature, the place he equally championed restricted federal interference in state issues.)
Rep. Darren Soto (D-FL-9)
Darren Soto has not advocated abolishing the Division of Schooling. Quite the opposite, as a Democrat he has emphasised the significance of federal help for college students. Rep. Soto’s focus has been on securing funding and assets for schooling slightly than dismantling businesses
In step with his celebration, he’s seemingly against proposals to remove the Division, although he hasn’t issued a selected latest quote on Trump’s plan. (Soto’s public feedback typically spotlight increasing academic alternative and affordability, signaling he would resist defunding the DOE.)
Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-FL-10)
Maxwell Frost has been a vocal opponent of efforts to close down the Division of Schooling. When President Trump issued an government order in March 2025 to start dismantling the division, Rep. Frost slammed the transfer as “reckless, merciless, and a direct assault on hundreds of thousands of kids”
He warned that abolishing the DOE would slash billions at school funding – slicing applications like Head Begin, Title I support for low-income faculties, Pell Grants, and help for college students with disabilities
Frost vowed to struggle the administration’s actions “via litigation, laws, and funding” to forestall undermining of public schooling
Rep. Daniel Webster (R-FL-11)
Daniel Webster, a senior Republican, helps decreasing the federal position in schooling and cheered President Trump’s push to shutter the DOE. In March 2025, Webster praised Trump for “combating to take schooling out of Washington bureaucrats’ arms and provides it again to folks,” saying the plan would “minimize waste, broaden college alternative, and put the schooling of America’s kids first”
He has additionally co-sponsored laws to remove the Division. Webster’s stance is that returning management to states and households – by dismantling federal schooling forms – will profit college students and align with constitutional ideas.
Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL-12)
Gus Bilirakis has quietly supported his celebration’s efforts to abolish the Schooling Division. Whereas not identified for making public statements on this problem, Bilirakis did be a part of as a co-sponsor of H.R. 899 within the 119th Congress, which seeks to terminate the division and reroute its funding to states. His backing of that invoice signifies he agrees with rolling again the federal schooling forms. (On the whole, Bilirakis has emphasised native management in schooling coverage, and his vote historical past aligns with downsizing federal businesses in favor of state governance.)
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL-13)
Anna Paulina Luna has actively aligned with proposals to dismantle the Division of Schooling. In 2023, her first 12 months in workplace, Luna signed on as a co-sponsor of Rep. Massie’s one-sentence invoice to abolish the DOE by the top of that 12 months
She has continued to help comparable measures in 2024–2025. Though Rep. Luna hasn’t been broadly quoted on this particular problem up to now two years, her legislative file – co-sponsoring the abolish-DOE invoice alongside different Florida Republicans – clearly signifies she favors eliminating the federal Division of Schooling and leaving schooling governance to state and native authorities
Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL-14)
Kathy Castor has made no strikes to dismantle the Division of Schooling; in truth, she strongly helps the division’s position in aiding college students. Castor has not issued any notable public remark particularly in regards to the latest abolition proposals – seemingly as a result of she firmly opposes them. As a Democrat, she has emphasised the significance of federal investments in faculties and applications in her Tampa-area district. (No latest statements from Castor point out the abolition concept, however her common stance has been to criticize cuts to schooling and to defend DOE initiatives that broaden entry to high quality schooling.)
Rep. Laurel Lee (R-FL-15)
Laurel Lee has quietly lent her help to efforts aimed toward downsizing the federal Schooling Division. In 2025, Rep. Lee joined as a co-sponsor of H.R. 899 to remove the division
She has not been within the headlines for statements on this problem, however via her co-sponsorship, she signaled settlement that schooling selections needs to be returned to state and native arms. (Lee’s focus in Congress has spanned a number of points; on schooling, she has toed the Republican line that the DOE’s authority needs to be curtailed.)
Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL-16)
Vern Buchanan, certainly one of Florida’s senior Home Republicans, additionally threw his help behind laws to dismantle the Division of Schooling. Within the present Congress, Buchanan is listed as a co-sponsor of the invoice to terminate the division
He has not made latest public speeches in regards to the concept, however his backing of the invoice aligns with the GOP argument that the DOE has failed to enhance outcomes and that schooling could be higher managed by states. Buchanan’s place is evidenced by his quiet co-sponsorship slightly than outspoken commentary.
Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL-17)
Greg Steube has been specific in calling for the abolition of the Division of Schooling. In response to President Trump’s March 2025 government order, Steube exclaimed that it was “an excellent first step” and urged that “Congress should observe [the President’s] lead by abolishing the Division of Schooling as soon as and for all.”
Steube, a staunch conservative, additionally co-sponsored H.R. 899 and comparable payments. His public remarks underscore his perception that the DOE is unconstitutional or pointless – he famous you “don’t see anyplace listed within the Structure” for a federal schooling division and that dismantling it will be “nice for the nation”
Rep. Scott Franklin (R-FL-18)
Scott Franklin has endorsed efforts to remove the federal Schooling Division, although in a low-profile approach. Franklin joined lots of his GOP colleagues as a co-sponsor of the 2025 invoice to abolish the DOE.
He has not made outstanding public statements about this problem up to now two years. Nevertheless, by supporting that laws, Franklin aligns with the view that schooling needs to be an area/state matter and that the Division’s capabilities will be pared again or reassigned slightly than managed from Washington. (No particular latest quotes from Franklin on the division have been discovered.)
Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL-19)
Byron Donalds has been a robust advocate for shutting down the Division of Schooling. He co-sponsored payments in 2023 to abolish the division
After President Trump’s 2025 government motion he publicly cheered the transfer. Donalds tweeted that the Division of Schooling “has FAILED”, accusing it of prioritizing forms over youngsters’ success, and declared, “It’s time to return schooling to the states”
He argued Florida will guarantee its college students excel as soon as free of federal dictates
Donalds’ latest statements and legislative efforts go away little question that he desires the DOE dismantled and its authority devolved to state governments.
Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL-20)
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick has not supported abolishing the Division of Schooling. There aren’t any identified public statements from her within the final two years calling for the DOE’s elimination – unsurprising, as she is a Democrat who favors strong federal help for schooling. Cherfilus-McCormick has as a substitute targeted on points like fairness in schooling and federal assets for her South Florida district. In step with Democratic colleagues, she would presumably oppose any try to defund or dismantle the division (despite the fact that she hasn’t been quoted on the Trump administration’s latest strikes).
Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL-21)
Brian Mast has aligned with GOP efforts to abolish the Schooling Division, albeit with out fanfare. Rep. Mast is listed among the many co-sponsors of the 2025 Home invoice to terminate the division.
He has not made noteworthy public feedback about this initiative up to now two years. Nonetheless, by co-sponsoring that laws, Mast signaled settlement that the federal DOE is expendable and that academic management ought to return to states and native communities. (Mast’s official communications in 2023–2024 centered extra on veterans and environmental points, however his voting file displays help for shrinking federal involvement in schooling.)
Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL-22)
Lois Frankel has not voiced any help for dismantling the Division of Schooling. As a Democratic lawmaker, she has persistently supported federal education schemes and funding, and he or she has criticized Trump-era schooling cuts. Within the final two years, Frankel didn’t problem a selected assertion on proposals to abolish the DOE – seemingly as a result of she staunchly disagrees with them. Her common place has been that the Division’s work (from Pell Grants to civil rights enforcement) is important, so one can infer she opposes latest GOP efforts, even when she hasn’t spoken on them at size publicly.
Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL-23)
Jared Moskowitz has not made headlines relating to the abolition of the Schooling Division. He’s a freshman Democrat who has largely targeted on points like catastrophe reduction and antisemitism in his early tenure. Moskowitz has not supported any initiative to remove the DOE; quite the opposite, he tends to help federal funding for faculties (he was even a part of a group of lawmakers protesting at DOE headquarters when rumors swirled about its closure.
Whereas he hasn’t issued a proper press launch on the topic, one can conclude Moskowitz stands towards dismantling the division and would vote to protect its important applications.
Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL-24)
Frederica Wilson, a senior Democrat on the Home Schooling and Workforce Committee, has been an ardent defender of the DOE. In March 2025, after President Trump ordered the DOE’s dismantling, Wilson launched a blistering assertion calling the transfer “the center and cloth” of America-changing motion
A former educator herself, she stated “Closing the doorways to the Division of Schooling is closing the doorways to alternatives for our youth”
Wilson warned that gutting the division would “break down our public schooling system” and particularly hurt kids of colour, college students with disabilities, and different susceptible teams
She urged Congressional Republicans to reverse course and vowed to struggle any try to abolish the DOE.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL-25)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been a vocal opponent of abolishing the DOE, vehemently criticizing President Trump’s plan. In a South Florida TV interview, she blasted the manager order as “the worst attainable resolution for our youngsters”, warning it will put vital federal college funding in jeopardy.
Wasserman Schultz argued the try to shut the division isn’t solely dangerous however “illegal,” vowing to “struggle [Trump] tooth and nail” and predicting the transfer “shall be fought within the courts, and he’ll lose”
Her stance is that dismantling the DOE would damage college students – she says Trump is successfully “going to harm kids” – and he or she has positioned herself as a number one voice towards the Division’s elimination
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL-26)
Mario Diaz-Balart has quietly supported the initiative to remove the DOE Within the 119th Congress, Diaz-Balart signed on as a co-sponsor of laws to abolish the DOE.
He hasn’t issued outstanding public statements on the matter up to now two years. Historically a proponent of native management (and an ally of Florida’s state management on schooling points), Diaz-Balart’s backing of the abolish-DOE invoice suggests he agrees that the federal division is pointless. He’s prone to vote in favor of any measure that will dismantle it, even when he leaves the ground arguments to others.
Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL-27)
Maria Elvira Salazar has additionally lent her help to efforts to dismantle the DOE, although with out public fanfare. She joined as a co-sponsor of H.R. 899 in early 2025indicating her settlement with eliminating the DOE. Salazar has not made notable speeches or media feedback about this particular problem. Nevertheless, her co-sponsorship aligns with the broader Republican stance that federal involvement in schooling needs to be scaled again. In her public messaging, Salazar usually highlights empowering dad and mom and bettering faculties in her district – targets she presumably believes will be superior by eradicating federal bureaucratic hurdles (i.e., the DOE).
Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL-28)
Carlos Gimenez, a former Miami-Dade mayor, has come out in favor of rolling again the Division of Schooling on the federal degree. He’s listed as a co-sponsor of the 2025 Home invoice to abolish the division.
Whereas Gimenez has not been quoted in nationwide media particularly about this, he has typically advocated for decentralizing management and giving extra authority to native college boards. By supporting laws to dismantle the DOE, Gimenez aligns with that philosophy, arguing implicitly that Florida (and different states) can handle schooling with out Washington’s intervention. No contradictory public statements from him have appeared, so his place is obvious via his legislative backing of the Division’s elimination.
