Sugar cane farms on land put aside for Everglades restoration? Peanut farming on property that might have been a Florida state park?
That’s what some environmental teams are frightened about with a proposal buried in a sweeping farm invoice, shifting steadily by means of the Florida Legislature, that they argue would “essentially change how Florida treats conservation lands.”
A bit of Senate Invoice 290 would direct Florida’s surroundings and agriculture departments to find out whether or not any state-owned land bought for conservation since January 2024 is “appropriate” for agriculture, in response to the invoice language.
If a property checks that field, it might be offered off for agriculture, in response to the proposal. Underneath the invoice, the then-privately-owned land would nonetheless be protected against improvement with a rural lands easement, permitting for makes use of like cattle ranching however eradicating the specter of subdivisions.
The proposal wouldn’t apply to state forests, state parks or wildlife administration areas, in response to the language of the invoice, which is sponsored by state Sen. Keith Truenow, R- Tavares on the Senate facet and Hillsborough County Republican Rep. Danny Alvarez within the Home.
Audubon Florida is one group involved in regards to the measure, saying that conservation land offered to personal agriculture operations would take away the general public’s entry to climbing, tenting or recreating.
The nonprofit additionally stated it’s frightened that newly bought conservation lands might be “flipped” for agriculture earlier than they obtain everlasting protections.
“The query shouldn’t be: ‘Are conservation lands appropriate for agriculture?’ however relatively, ‘Is agriculture appropriate for state lands?’” stated Julie Wraithmell, govt director of Audubon Florida. “It’s an unimaginable overreach, and I’d argue it’s unconstitutional.” Sierra Membership Florida additionally stated the invoice would centralize land-management selections beneath the agriculture division.
Proper now, Florida legislation creates a rigorous course of for promoting off lands that have been bought for conservation. A committee beneath Florida’s environmental regulatory company, the Acquisition and Restoration Council, makes a suggestion to the governor and Cupboard then the group should vote on whether or not the lands “are now not wanted for conservation functions.”
Opponents of the measure say that course of would now prioritize land’s agricultural advantages over its public use, watershed safety and wildlife habitat.
These in favor of the farm invoice, nevertheless, like former president of the Florida Cattlemen’s Affiliation Pat Durden, say the measure would give a “a lot better possibility” for land administration by placing state-run lands again into the palms of personal property homeowners, together with ranchers whose work sustaining the land attracts in and harbors different Florida wildlife.
Proceeds of land gross sales, in response to the measure, would return into the agriculture division’s belief fund for extra conservation easements, which Durden stated would assist increase the Florida Wildlife Hall.
“It offers us a software that proper now is just not actually there,” Durden stated, including that some state lands are “mismanaged,” expensive and sometimes overgrown with invasive crops.
“I feel it’s actually troublesome for folks to know, with out going out on the ranches and seeing that, hey, that is what land administration seems to be like,” Durden stated.
Neither the Florida Division of Environmental Safety nor the Florida Division of Agriculture and Client Companies responded to requests for remark. The invoice’s Senate sponsor, Sen. Truenow, additionally didn’t reply to a request searching for remark.
The measure is a part of the wide-ranging precedence invoice, generally referred to as the 2026 Florida Farm Invoice, for the state’s Division of Agriculture and Client Companies. Agriculture commissioner Wilton Simpson has celebrated the invoice he stated “defends the individuals who feed our state and our nation.”
A lot of the on-line opposition to the invoice has been centered on a separate part that will enable farming operations to sue for damages over “disparagement” of an agricultural product.
Clear water advocates, spearheaded by a marketing campaign from the nonprofit Captains for Clear Water, argue the invoice would “financially punish residents, nonprofits, and journalists for talking out about agricultural practices that impression Florida’s waterways.”
Going through a groundswell of opposition, the invoice’s Home sponsor stated final week he would work on the considerations after a state Home panel moved the measure ahead. The Senate’s model of the invoice is subsequent scheduled to be heard Tuesday morning within the Senate Guidelines committee.
©2026 Tampa Bay Occasions. Go to tampabay.com. Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.
